The virtual nostalgia boom
As mergers and acquisitions go, this is surely a first. Usually what we get after the consummation of these dangerous liaisons is corporate guff about "synergy" and "efficiency gains". Yet here we have a CEO declaring that the one thing she will not do is destroy the outfit for which she has just paid a shedload of money. (An outfit, by the way, that had just $14m in revenues last year .)
It's possible, of course, that Mayer knows what she's doing. A more plausible hypothesis, however, is that she's following an established strategic playbook. Technology companies start out being innovative. But as they grow they become like every other industrial corporation in one important respect: they find it increasingly difficult to innovate. So what they then do is to buy small innovative companies and rebadge their products. This is often how Microsoft (to take just one example) innovated: some of its best-known applications (PowerPoint, Internet Explorer, FrontPage, Hotmail) were created not by Microsoft but by companies the Redmond giant acquired.
What may also have been on Mayer's mind is a similar gambit recently executed by Facebook when it paid a billion dollars for Instagram, an online photo-sharing service that was likewise believed to be popular with yoof. Instagram enables smartphone users to take photographs, degrade them by pushing them through various kinds of filter and then publish the results online. The basic idea is that you can make a humdrum picture of a soup tin masquerade as "art". Andy Warhol used to say that anyone could be famous for 15 minutes; with Instagram, anyone can masquerade as Andy Warhol 15 times a day, kazingotm has learnt from The Guardian.
Instagram filters represent an interesting contemporary phenomenon - what one might call analogue nostalgia. Digital technology enables anyone to take photographs that are - technically - flawless, in the sense of being sharply focused and properly exposed. Some cameras even have features such as smile detectors so that they won't shoot until they detect at least a rictus grin. They have elaborate systems for controlling or eliminating the "red eye" effect of direct flash photography . And, of course, if you don't get a satisfactory picture first time you can keep going until you get something that looks acceptable on the camera's LCD screen.
Read more